Imagine a scenario where political stability isn't just a goal but a crucial foundation for a country's progress—this idea forms the core of recent discussions surrounding Buganda, Uganda’s most influential sub-region. But here's where it gets controversial: some believe that maintaining calm and certainty within institutions is essential to unlocking sustainable economic growth, attracting vital investments, and fostering national development. Political analyst Charles Rwomushana passionately emphasizes the importance of stability in Buganda, explaining that Uganda's real strength lies in its ability to draw skilled workers, entrepreneurs, and professionals from various regions and even from abroad.
During an appearance on NBS Barometer on Tuesday, Rwomushana highlighted that peace and stability are fundamental to ensuring that the country's progress isn’t just temporary but can be continuously maintained. He pointed out that when the government and institutions function smoothly and predictably, they create an environment where people feel confident to invest, develop businesses, and seek opportunities, which ultimately benefits everyone.
And this is the part most people miss—the influence of regional stability on national prosperity. As Uganda approaches its general elections scheduled for January 15, 2026, the political landscape is shifting rapidly. The ruling party, the National Resistance Movement (NRM), is ramping up its campaign efforts, especially in Buganda—a region that has traditionally wielded considerable political influence. Their presidential candidate, Yoweri Museveni, is currently touring throughout Buganda, engaging voters and trying to strengthen his support base. This tour is seen as a strategic attempt to regain ground that may have been lost in recent years.
The highlight of these efforts is expected to be a major rally at Kololo Ceremonial Grounds, signaling how much the ruling party values this region. Historically, Buganda has been a battleground for political competition. In the last elections, support for the NRM sharply declined, with only about 35% of the presidential votes coming from the region, and just 31 out of 105 parliamentary seats secured—comparatively lower than in previous years when the NRM enjoyed around 69% in 2011 and over 80% in 2006.
Political experts attribute this decline to several key factors. One is the rising prominence of Robert Kyagulanyi’s National Unity Platform (NUP), which has resonated strongly with the youth and opposition supporters. Additionally, ongoing issues such as land disputes, fears of land grabbing, and internal conflicts within the NRM—especially after some candidates chose to run as independents—have all contributed to the shifting political terrain.
Ultimately, the current situation in Buganda presents a vivid example of how regional stability, political dynamics, and public support are intricately linked—and how they can reshape the national political landscape. The question remains: will the NRM be able to solidify its influence in Buganda before the upcoming elections, or will new voices and issues continue to challenge its dominance? Share your thoughts—do you believe stability can be restored quickly, or are deeper political shifts inevitable?
